“Many women were there looking on from a distance, who had followed Jesus from Galilee while ministering to Him. Among them was Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James and Joseph, and the mother of the sons of Zebedee” (Mt. 27:55-56 NASB).
Our words are very important. Therefore, why do we continue to make a distinction when using the term ‘disciple’ when preaching and teaching from the gospels? It may not be intentional, but when women are referred to as only ‘women’ and men are referred to as ‘disciples,’ the implication is that the women who were following Jesus were not as important as the men. Do we perform an injustice by not referring to women in the gospels as disciples? Throughout the gospels, women are always involved in the ministry of Jesus. Just in the Gospel of Matthew we see that Peter’s mother-in law served Jesus (Mt. 8:14-15), a woman anointed Jesus (Mt. 26:6-13), women were present at Jesus’ crucifixion and burial (Mt. 27), and women were the first to preach about his resurrection (Mt. 28). Additionally, in Luke, we see that women were following Jesus along with the twelve (Lk. 8:1-3), and Mary was seated at the Lord’s feet (Lk. 10:38-42). Martina S. Gnadt writes, “Although these women in Matthew are of central importance for understanding what the discipleship called for by Jesus entails, they go for the most part unnamed and are not included in the group of ‘disciples'” [“Gospel of Matthew: Jewish-Christian Churches in Opposition to the Pax Romana” in Feminist Biblical Interpretation (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2012), 623].
Since the gospel accounts clearly illustrate that women were disciples of Jesus, it behooves us to use appropriate language in our teaching and preaching that speaks to this truth. Perhaps you believe that this issue is insignificant. What percentage of people in your congregation are women? Fifty percent? What message are they receiving when pastors and leaders speak of only men in the Bible as disciples? Does this not promote a theology of patriarchy? Are we incorrectly implying that Jesus did not value women as much as men? These women who followed Jesus, demonstrated what it meant to be faithful disciples. Let us in turn speak truthfully and faithfully about their lives by acknowledging them as disciples too.
6 thoughts on “Why won’t you call me a disciple?”
Great point, Michelle. Jesus certainly seemed to be removing gender distinctions in Matthew 12:49.
Tim. Thank you for taking the time to read and comment on my post. Blessings, Michelle.
Great post, Michelle. Thanks for linking it on twitter, Tim.
I recently read an article by N.T. Wright in which he states that the reason Mary “sitting at Jesus’ feet” rather than helping Martha is a big deal, is that Mary was remaining with the men in the house occupying the place of a student–a disciple. And Jesus says it will not be taken from her.
In many cultures today, if a male guest comes into the house, the women take themselves off to a different part of the home. Mary didn’t do this and Jesus commends her for her desire to learn from him–for her desire to be His disciple.
Thanks for the comment. I agree with N.T. Wright; I think it was a bold thing for her to do, yet she must have known that Jesus would welcome her staying. Blessings to you, Michelle.
All it takes is our looking at the text withOUT colored glasses.
Ahh..but therein lies the rub. So many don’t want to take them off.
For the ones who don’t realize they’re wearing them, your post helps to point them out.
Bravo! Keep up the good work. 🙂
Julie, thank you for your comments and words of encouragement. God bless you! Michelle